Lamar Jackson’s texts to Baltimore Ravens staff over contract ‘leaked’

The protracted and often enigmatic contract negotiations between Baltimore Ravens quarterback Lamar Jackson and the franchise were a dominant storyline in the NFL for years. Now, new details have surfaced, revealing alleged text messages exchanged between Jackson and Ravens General Manager Eric DeCosta, shedding light on the intricate and at times contentious discussions that ultimately led to Jackson’s blockbuster five-year, $260 million deal in 2023. These revelations come amidst a landmark ruling in the NFL Players Association’s (NFLPA) collusion grievance against the league, a 61-page document that has inadvertently brought these private correspondences into the public domain

The notion of a star player’s personal communications with team management being “leaked” immediately ignites a firestorm of speculation and debate. In Jackson’s case, who notably represented himself throughout the negotiation process, these alleged texts offer an unprecedented glimpse into his unwavering stance on a fully guaranteed contract, the challenges faced by both sides, and the dramatic eleventh-hour resolution that kept one of the league’s most dynamic talents in Baltimore.

The Context: A Protracted Contract Saga

Lamar Jackson’s contract situation was a unique and closely watched narrative in the NFL. Drafted by the Ravens in 2018, Jackson quickly established himself as a revolutionary force, winning the NFL MVP award in 2019 and consistently leading one of the league’s most innovative offenses. Despite his undeniable talent and impact, a long-term extension proved elusive for several seasons.

A key sticking point was Jackson’s reported insistence on a fully guaranteed contract, a rarity in the NFL outside of the Cleveland Browns’ Deshaun Watson deal. While other top quarterbacks sign massive contracts, the vast majority of the money is not fully guaranteed at signing, providing teams with an out in case of injury or declining performance. Jackson, acting without a traditional agent, was seemingly pushing for a different paradigm, one that offered him maximum financial security in a physically demanding sport.

This quest for a fully guaranteed deal became a significant part of the negotiation narrative, leading to speculation, rumors, and even a trade request from Jackson in the 2023 offseason after the Ravens applied the non-exclusive franchise tag. The tag allowed Jackson to negotiate with other teams, with the Ravens retaining the right to match any offer or receive two first-round picks as compensation. Despite his availability, and to the surprise of many, no other teams publicly pursued Jackson with a fully guaranteed offer, fueling discussions about potential collusion among NFL owners to curb the trend of fully guaranteed deals following the Watson contract.

The Source of the “Leak”: An NFLPA Collusion Grievance

The “leaked” texts are not the result of a malicious hack or an anonymous tipster. Instead, they emerged as part of the official legal proceedings surrounding the NFLPA’s collusion grievance. This grievance alleged that NFL teams, encouraged by the league’s Management Council and Commissioner Roger Goodell, tacitly agreed to reduce guarantees in veteran contracts after the Deshaun Watson deal, thereby suppressing the market for players seeking fully guaranteed terms.

During the arbitration hearing for this grievance, extensive discovery was conducted, involving testimonies, emails, and, crucially, private text messages. It was through this formal legal process that Eric DeCosta’s testimony, including his direct communications with Lamar Jackson, became part of the official record. The 61-page arbitration ruling, subsequently referenced and detailed by various sports media outlets, is the source from which these “leaked” details have emerged. It’s important to note that while the arbitrator ultimately did not find sufficient evidence to prove widespread collusion against the NFL, the document itself has provided an unprecedented look into the inner workings of high-stakes contract negotiations.

The Content of the Alleged Texts: Jackson’s Firm Stance and Communication Challenges

The revelations from the arbitration document offer direct quotes from Jackson’s communications, providing concrete evidence of his demands and the unique challenges of negotiating with a self-represented player.

One of the most revealing alleged texts from Jackson to DeCosta came before the 2022 season, where Jackson explicitly stated his position: “I’m going to continue to request a FULLY GUARANTEED contract I understand you all DON’T and that’s fine.” This message underscores Jackson’s consistent and unwavering demand for a fully guaranteed deal, a demand that he seemingly articulated clearly to the Ravens’ front office. It demonstrates his resolve to secure what he believed was his market value and appropriate financial security, particularly after witnessing the Watson contract.

Another intriguing detail from DeCosta’s testimony involved what he described as “technical difficulties” hindering communication with Jackson. According to the ruling, DeCosta testified that Jackson claimed “the microphone on his phone was not working, making communications with Mr. DeCosta difficult.” While the document leaves open to interpretation whether this was a genuine technical issue or a tactic to slow down negotiations, it highlights an unusual aspect of the talks. Negotiating a multi-million dollar contract solely via text and without the facilitation of a professional agent is inherently complex, and such communication breakdowns, real or perceived, undoubtedly added layers of difficulty to the already sensitive discussions.

The documents also reveal that after the 2022 season, following the completion of his five-year rookie contract, Jackson again sought a fully guaranteed deal. In response, the Ravens reportedly offered two different three-year contracts that DeCosta “considered to be fully guaranteed.” However, Jackson declined both offers, subsequently requesting a trade. DeCosta even testified that he asked Jackson for a list of teams he would be interested in joining, but Jackson never provided one. This period marked a significant impasse, with the Ravens preparing for the 2023 NFL Draft under the assumption that Jackson might no longer be with the team.

The Resolution: A Surprise Acceptance on Draft Eve

The dramatic climax of the contract saga, as detailed in the arbitration ruling, came on the eve of the 2023 NFL Draft. With the Ravens seemingly resigned to a future without their MVP quarterback, DeCosta sent Jackson a new offer. “Much to Mr. DeCosta’s surprise, Mr. Jackson quickly accepted it,” states page 32 of the document. This swift acceptance brought an end to years of speculation and tension, securing Jackson’s future with the Ravens on a five-year, $260 million deal, making him the highest-paid player in the league at the time of signing.

This unexpected turn of events, particularly DeCosta’s surprise at the quick acceptance, suggests that Jackson’s strategy, however unconventional, ultimately paid off. It implies that the final offer met enough of his demands, or perhaps, after years of negotiating and the perceived lack of fully guaranteed offers from other teams (which the collusion grievance sought to explain), Jackson felt it was the right time to secure his long-term financial future.

Implications and Reactions

The surfacing of these texts has several implications for both Lamar Jackson and the NFL.

For Lamar Jackson: The texts reinforce his steadfast commitment to the principle of a fully guaranteed contract. It showcases his determination and his willingness to stand firm on his demands, even without the traditional support of an agent. While he ultimately did not receive a fully guaranteed deal in the same vein as Deshaun Watson, the negotiations likely pushed the Ravens to structure a deal that heavily favored guaranteed money, particularly in the early years. The situation also highlights the complexities and potential pitfalls of self-representation in high-stakes negotiations, though Jackson’s eventual success cannot be denied. Having won his second MVP in 2023 and performing at an elite level, Jackson’s leverage in future negotiations (especially given his rising cap hits in 2026 and 2027) will remain significant, and he may indeed renew his push for a more fully guaranteed structure.

For the Baltimore Ravens: The leaks confirm the challenges DeCosta faced in negotiating with Jackson directly, especially concerning the communication aspect. It also validates the team’s public stance that they were committed to Jackson, despite the prolonged negotiations and the brief trade request. The fact that DeCosta was preparing for a future without Jackson underscores how close the team came to moving on, making the eleventh-hour deal even more significant for the franchise and its fanbase. The stability that Jackson’s contract has brought has allowed the Ravens to continue building a Super Bowl contender, a reality that might have been very different had the negotiations faltered permanently.

For the NFL and NFLPA: The details emerging from the collusion grievance hearing, including these texts, contribute to a broader understanding of how team owners and the league potentially discuss and influence contract structures across the NFL. While the arbitrator did not find collusion, the mere existence of such discussions and the explicit desire by owners to avoid fully guaranteed deals (as evidenced by Kyler Murray and Russell Wilson also seeking them and not receiving them) will remain a point of contention for the NFLPA. This transparency, albeit forced through legal channels, provides valuable insight for future collective bargaining agreements and individual player negotiations.

A Window into the NFL’s Most Private Negotiations

The alleged leak of Lamar Jackson’s text messages to Baltimore Ravens staff regarding his contract negotiations is a fascinating development, offering a rare and intimate look into the often-secretive world of NFL business. These communications, unearthed through a separate legal battle, paint a clearer picture of Jackson’s resolute pursuit of a fully guaranteed deal, the arduous nature of the talks with General Manager Eric DeCosta, and the surprising speed with which a final agreement was reached.

While the “broken mic” anecdote adds a touch of human, if perplexing, detail to the high-stakes talks, the core revelation is Jackson’s consistent demand for financial security mirroring that of his peers. The resolution, arriving unexpectedly on the eve of the 2023 NFL Draft, underscored both the Ravens’ commitment to their franchise quarterback and Jackson’s eventual pragmatic acceptance of a deal that, while not fully guaranteed by his initial definition, was still among the largest in NFL history. As Jackson continues his illustrious career, and as his current contract approaches critical junctures in terms of cap implications, these unearthed texts serve as a powerful reminder of the complex, personal, and sometimes dramatic journey that defined one of the most significant contract sagas in recent NFL memory.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *